The server provides 6 tools with mixed quality. All tools have names following the verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, list_, enable_, setup_) and descriptions present. However, parameter descriptions are minimal, output schemas are not documented in the source code, and error handling guidance is absent. The tools are generally well-named and address specific domain concerns (Swift patterns, Patreon integration), but lack the depth of documentation and schema rigor expected for production use. Parameter validation rules are not visible in the tool definitions. Input schemas exist but descriptions are brief (10-50 chars) for parameters like 'topic', 'query', 'source', and 'minQuality'.

• Document the output schema for all 6 tools. Specify fields returned (e.g., get_swift_pattern returns: pattern_id, title, description, code_example, source, quality_score, url). This enables tool chaining and LLM planning.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 50-150 chars with format and range guidance. Example: 'minQuality (0-100): Minimum quality rating. Patterns below this threshold are excluded. Typical values: 70+ for production-ready, 50+ for learning. Default: 70.'
• Add error handling guidance to each tool description. Example: 'If source not found, returns list of available sources. If Patreon credentials missing, setup_patreon must be called first.'
• Define valid values for 'source' parameter as an enum in the schema (based on list_content_sources output: sundell, vanderlee, nilcoalescing, pointfree, patreon) and reference in description.
• Clarify setup_patreon behavior: Does it return a URL? A token? Does the LLM need to wait for user interaction? Add prerequisites and success/failure conditions.
• Document requireCode parameter in search_swift_content: 'When true, only results with runnable code examples are returned. When false (default), articles and tutorials without code are included.'
• Add pagination guidance to search_swift_content and get_swift_pattern if they return multiple results. Specify if results are capped (e.g., 'Returns top 20 matches') and whether offset/limit parameters exist.
• Include idempotency information: Are repeated calls to enable_source safe? Does setup_patreon overwrite previous auth or require explicit reset?