This server defines 10 tools with basic descriptions and schemas. However, significant gaps prevent a higher score: (1) Most parameter descriptions are minimal (10-30 chars) and lack guidance on constraints, formats, or expected values. (2) No output schemas are documented, tools return strings or objects but LLMs cannot see the expected structure. (3) Error handling is present in implementation (throws Error) but descriptions do not guide recovery ('See: search_notes first'). (4) Tool naming is adequate (verb_noun) but some descriptions are too brief to disambiguate intent. (5) The server handles core Obsidian operations but lacks production-grade polish. Naming is generally good (search_notes, read_note, create_note, delete_note follow conventions), but parameter descriptions are under-specified, e.g., 'Path to the note file relative to vault root' lacks validation rules or format guidance. No return schemas documented anywhere. Error messages in code ('笔记不存在: {notePath}') are in Chinese and not optimized for LLM parsing.

• Document output schemas for all tools. E.g., search_notes should declare: 'Returns an array of objects: [{path: string, name: string, tags: string[], summary: string}]'. Every tool needs explicit return type documentation.
• Expand parameter descriptions to 60-120 characters and include constraints. E.g., 'note_path (string): Path to the note file relative to vault root. Must use forward slashes, end with .md, and contain only alphanumeric, hyphen, underscore, and space characters. Paths must not start with . or contain consecutive slashes.'
• Add recovery hints to descriptions of tools that fail. E.g., read_note: 'If note not found, use search_notes to find the correct path first. Note paths are case-sensitive.'
• Add a confirm step or dry-run parameter to delete_note to prevent accidental deletion. E.g., 'Optional confirm: boolean. If false or omitted, returns what would be deleted without executing.'
• Disambiguate search_notes vs full_text_search in descriptions. E.g., search_notes: 'For fast, indexed searches by name, tag, or metadata. Use this first.' full_text_search: 'For searching note content text. Slower but finds matches inside note bodies. Use after search_notes if topic not found.'
• Remove or restructure get_prompt_guide. Either: (1) Make it return structured metadata {organizationRules: {...}} instead of long text, or (2) Remove it and embed guidance in descriptions of other tools.
• For list_folder and get_vault_structure, clarify in descriptions: list_folder returns only immediate children (one level); get_vault_structure is recursive. Add example usage hints.