Secure your AI agent and agentic AI application ecosystem with DeepSecure. Provides agent identity management, secure credential storage, and security governance for AI agents.
DeepSecure defines 2 tools with descriptions and input schemas present in deepsecure/main.py. However, critical issues severely limit quality: (1) Tool naming does not follow verb_noun convention, 'agent' is not an action verb and is ambiguous (does it create? retrieve? both?). 'get_secret' is better but generic. (2) Descriptions are extremely brief (36 and 57 chars respectively), well below the 10-1024 character guideline and provide minimal context for LLM tool selection. 'Fetch a secret securely through DeepSecure with audit logging' does not explain WHEN to use this vs. other secret retrieval mechanisms, or what the agent_id represents. (3) Parameter descriptions are missing entirely, no explanation of what 'agent_id', 'secret_name', 'path', 'agent_name', or 'auto_create' actually do in the context of DeepSecure's security model. (4) Output schemas are not documented, LLMs have no visibility into what fields these tools return, preventing downstream tool composition. (5) No error handling guidance, no indication of retryable vs. fatal errors, no recovery suggestions. (6) Security critical: the 'agent_id' parameter naming is vague and could leak sensitive information if logged; no indication of how secrets are handled in responses. (7) Tool 'agent' conflates two operations (create OR retrieve) in one tool, violating single-responsibility principle. Source code provides Makefile and Docker/requirements files but NO explicit MCP server implementation visible, tool definitions appear inferred from file path references only.
Create or retrieve a DeepSecure agent identity with optional auto-creation
Fetch a secret securely through DeepSecure with audit logging
Tool 'agent' uses non-action verb name. 'agent' is a noun, not a verb, does not clearly signal create, retrieve, or update operation. Violates verb_noun naming convention.
All parameter descriptions are missing. Parameters 'agent_id', 'secret_name', 'path', 'agent_name', 'auto_create' have no descriptions. LLMs cannot infer what these mean without explicit text.
Tool descriptions are far too brief (36 chars, 57 chars). Minimum effective description is 50+ chars with clear WHAT/WHEN/WHY context. Current descriptions lack guidance on tool selection.
Output schemas are not documented. Source code shows no indication of what fields get_secret and agent tools return. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract required data.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | F | 36 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 30 | - | v1 |
Tool 'agent' combines two operations: create-if-not-exists and retrieve. Violates single-responsibility principle. Should be split into 'create_agent' and 'get_agent_identity'.
No error handling guidance. No indication of retryable errors, user-fixable errors, or fatal conditions. No recovery suggestions provided.
Security concern: 'agent_id' parameter naming is vague and could leak sensitive agent identifiers in logs. No documentation of how secrets are stripped from responses before LLM context.