An OAuth authorization server gateway for MCP clients with Okta integration, providing OAuth 2.0 authorization, token management, and dynamic client registration with PKCE support
Two simple tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant quality gaps. Both tools have descriptions and input schemas visible in the source code (mcp/dice/src/index.ts and mcp/uuid/src/index.ts), but they are extremely minimal. The 'dice' tool has a description in Japanese ('サイコロを振った結果を返します' = 'Returns the result of rolling a die'), which is 24 chars, acceptable but terse. The 'uuid' tool has a similar brief description in Japanese ('UUID(バージョン4)を生成して返します' = 'Generate and return UUID v4'). Neither tool name starts with a clear action verb in the English context (though 'dice' is noun-like and 'uuid' is a noun). Neither tool description answers WHEN to use it or provides context beyond the raw action. Neither tool declares its output schema, LLMs must infer from the code that both return text-based results. The dice tool's 'sides' parameter has a description ('サイコロの面の数' = 'number of die faces') and type (number with min=1, default=6), which is better than many servers. The uuid tool has no parameters. No error handling guidance, no recovery hints. Output format is hardcoded in the implementation (returning {content: [{type: 'text', text: ...}]}) but never documented. Overall, these are toy tools with bare-minimum definitions.
サイコロを振った結果を返します
UUID(バージョン4)を生成して返します
Tool names do not start with action verbs. 'dice' and 'uuid' are nouns; should be 'roll_dice' and 'generate_uuid' for clarity on intent.
Descriptions are minimal (24 and ~25 chars) and do not explain WHEN to use the tool or its purpose in a larger workflow.
Output schemas are not documented. LLMs cannot predict return structure (text field, object shape, possible errors). Hardcoded in implementation but invisible to consumers.
No error handling guidance or recovery hints. If dice receives invalid 'sides' or uuid generation fails, no recovery path is documented.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 48 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 36 | - | v1 |
Descriptions are in Japanese only, making them inaccessible to most English-speaking LLM systems and developers.