Loading ToolBench
Educational repository with multiple AI agent frameworks and patterns, including LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, Pydantic-AI, Atomic Agents, and Agno implementations. Includes RAG systems, multi-agent patterns, and enterprise integration examples.
Scoring was not performed
file_ops tool name violates single-responsibility principle: accepts both 'read' and 'write' operations. Should be split into read_file and write_file. Tool name 'file_ops' is also generic and does not clearly convey intent.
No output schemas documented for any tool. LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract structured results. All 16 tools lack documented return types and field names.
Destructive/state-modifying tools (file_ops, trigger_etl_workflow, publish_data_stream, send_email, update_pipeline_status) have no dry-run, confirmation, or error recovery guidance. No pattern for idempotency or rollback.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 25 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 44 | - | v1 |
Parameter descriptions missing or too brief. Example: file_ops 'path' param has only 9 chars ('File path'). 'content' param in write operation is unclear whether it's required. Database tools lack SQL injection prevention guidance.
Tool descriptions are too brief to guide LLM selection. Examples: 'Perform mathematical calculations' (27 chars), 'Search the web for information' (31 chars), 'Trigger Airflow DAG for ETL workflow execution' (47 chars). Missing WHEN to use, prerequisites, and side effects.
No error handling guidance visible in any tool definition. No recovery hints (e.g., 'If query fails, try simplifying the WHERE clause'). No classification of errors as retryable vs user-fixable vs fatal.
Security concerns not addressed in tool definitions: file_ops accepts arbitrary paths with no sanitization guidance (path traversal risk). No mention of secret injection, permission gates, or audit trails in any tool.
Parameter constraints not formally specified. Example: web_search 'num_results' has no min/max (baseline should be 1-100). Database tools have no validation hints for SQL injection prevention. No enum constraints despite multiple tools accepting predefined values.
Missing pagination guidance on list-returning tools (query_data_lake, search_data_catalog, advanced_search, news_search). No indication of default limits, max results, or cursor/offset parameters.
Tool composition issues: publish_data_stream 'partition' parameter is optional with default null but semantics unclear. Several tools (execute_analytics_query, database_query) accept free-form SQL with no multi-step workflow guidance.