Loading ToolBench
Single tool with minimal definition quality. Tool name 'sample-tool' does not follow verb_noun convention and is generic/placeholder-like. Description is adequate but brief (57 chars). Input schema is present with Zod validation but parameter description is minimal (53 chars). No output schema documented. No error handling guidance. Tool appears to be a template placeholder rather than production-ready.
A sample tool for demonstration purposes
Tool name 'sample-tool' violates verb_noun naming convention. Does not start with action verb (get, create, send, update, etc.). Generic 'sample' name signals placeholder code, not production intent.
No output schema documented. Response structure (text content array) is hardcoded in implementation but not declared in tool definition. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations without knowing what fields/structure to expect.
Input parameter 'input' has ambiguous name and minimal description. Parameter description (53 chars) does not explain format, length constraints, or expected content. Does it accept free-form text? IDs? Code? Unclear.
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tool returns success unconditionally. No validation of input length/format. No indication of what could fail or how LLM should respond to errors.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 48 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 24 | - | v1 |
Tool description states 'A sample tool for demonstration purposes', explicitly signals this is not production code. Template nature undermines all other quality signals.