Loading ToolBench
A full-stack AI agent platform with multi-provider LLM support, web fetching, code execution in sandboxes, brokerage integrations, and MCP server ecosystem management
The LangAlpha MCP server exposes only ONE tool: 'Read'. The tool name lacks a clear action verb (should be 'read_file'), the description is dismissive ('Present only so the assistant's tool call is well formed'), parameter descriptions are minimal, and there is no documented output schema. The description explicitly states the tool exists for form compliance rather than actual utility, which violates fundamental tool design patterns. The server appears to be a test/probe utility (filename: 'probe_tool_message_modality.py') rather than a production MCP server.
Read a file. Present only so the assistant's tool call is well formed.
Tool name 'Read' is not a verb_noun pattern. Should be 'read_file' to match LLM parsing conventions.
Tool description is dismissive and non-actionable: 'Present only so the assistant's tool call is well formed.' This does not explain WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, or what it returns. Description must be 10-1024 chars and explain purpose clearly.
Input parameter 'file_path' has minimal description ('Path to the file to read'). Missing critical details: format constraints, allowed directory scope, size limits, whether paths are absolute/relative, and any security boundaries (e.g., jail to a safe directory).
No output schema documented. Tool does not specify what fields are returned when a file is read (e.g., does it return {content: string}? {content: string, encoding: string, size: int}?). LLMs cannot plan downstream operations without knowing output structure.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 46 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | D | 58 | - | v1 |
No error handling guidance. Tool does not document what happens if file does not exist, if path is outside allowed directory, if file is too large to read, or if permission is denied. LLM cannot recover from failures without actionable error messages.
Security concern: file_path parameter accepts arbitrary input with no documented boundaries. Server should validate that paths stay within a safe sandbox (e.g., a designated data directory) to prevent directory traversal attacks.
Tool appears to be a probe/test utility rather than a production MCP server. The filename 'probe_tool_message_modality.py' and dismissive description suggest this is for protocol testing, not actual file-reading functionality that users would rely on.