Provides SvelteKit and Tailwind CSS documentation and code snippets.
This MCP server has 11 tools with significant definition quality gaps. Most tools have basic descriptions but lack detailed parameter documentation and output schema specifications. Two major issues dominate: (1) Four tools (tools 1, 2, 4, 5) are explicitly marked [LEGACY] and cover only 4-8% of their respective documentation, creating poor user experience and forcing LLMs to choose between inadequate options. (2) Parameter descriptions are minimal, most parameters have 1-2 line descriptions lacking format constraints, ranges, or usage guidance. Output schemas are not documented in the visible code, making it impossible for LLMs to plan downstream tool calls or validate responses. Tool naming is mostly strong (verb_noun pattern followed), but descriptions range from 40-150 characters with several generic or incomplete. Error handling is not visible in the code provided. The server does implement input validation patterns (regex constraints on some parameters), but this alone cannot compensate for missing output documentation and the fundamental design flaw of offering deprecated legacy tools alongside newer replacements.
Get a Svelte component code snippet for a specific UI element.
Get the complete Svelte and SvelteKit documentation in LLM-optimized format.
[LEGACY] Get SvelteKit documentation for a specific topic. NOTE: This tool only covers ~8% of SvelteKit docs. Use 'get_svelte_full_docs' for complete documentation coverage.
Get the complete Tailwind CSS documentation extracted from GitHub in LLM-optimized format.
[LEGACY] Get Tailwind CSS information for a specific query. NOTE: This tool only covers ~4% of Tailwind docs. Use 'get_tailwind_full_docs' for complete documentation coverage.
List all available component snippet categories.
Four tools marked [LEGACY] with severe coverage limitations (4-8% of docs). Tools 1, 2, 4, 5 (get_sveltekit_doc, get_tailwind_info, list_sveltekit_topics, list_tailwind_info_topics) explicitly direct users to other tools, creating poor UX and decision burden for LLMs. These should be removed or hidden from tool listings entirely.
No visible output schemas documented in source code. Tools return unstructured text via content[0].text (visible in test files), but LLMs cannot infer expected fields, structure, or pagination. This violates pattern:tool and makes multi-step tool composition fragile.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 48 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 28 | - | v1 |
List all available snippets within a specific category.
[LEGACY] List all available SvelteKit documentation topics. NOTE: This tool only lists ~8% of SvelteKit topics. Use 'get_svelte_full_docs' for complete documentation coverage.
[LEGACY] List all available Tailwind CSS topics. NOTE: This tool only lists ~4% of Tailwind topics. Use 'get_tailwind_full_docs' for complete documentation coverage.
Search the complete Svelte documentation using semantic search.
Search the complete Tailwind CSS documentation using semantic search.
Parameter descriptions are minimal and lack format constraints. For example, 'topic' parameter in get_sveltekit_doc has description 'The documentation topic (e.g., 'routing', 'hooks')' but does not specify the expected format, length limits are only in schema constraints (not visible to LLM), or how topics are discovered. Descriptions under 20 characters on several params.
No error handling guidance visible in code. Error responses and recovery paths are not documented. If a topic does not exist in get_sveltekit_doc or search returns no results, LLMs have no guidance on what to try next.
No pagination support visible. Tools like get_svelte_full_docs and get_tailwind_full_docs return 'complete' documentation with no documented limits or offset/page parameters. If these tools return very large responses, context window exhaustion is likely.
Regex patterns in parameter schemas (e.g., '^[a-zA-Z0-9\-_.]+$') are not documented in descriptions. LLMs cannot read schema constraints directly, they rely on description text. Users/LLMs will not know what characters are allowed without inspecting the schema JSON.