bito-lint is a writing quality analysis tool with 8 well-structured tools. All tools have descriptions and appear to have input schemas defined via schemars. Naming is consistent (verb_noun pattern: get_*, check_*, count_*, analyze_*, lint_*). However, critical gaps exist: (1) No visible output schema documentation, the response structure for each tool is not shown in the code provided, making it impossible to verify what fields agents can extract. (2) Parameter descriptions are present but generic in places (e.g., 'The text to analyze' lacks guidance on length limits or expected format). (3) No error handling strategy visible, what happens if text exceeds tokenizer limits, if grammar check fails, or if a template is invalid? (4) Tool composition is strong (eight single-purpose tools, good chaining potential), but missing context for agent use (e.g., should analyze_writing be called before lint_file? Are there dependencies?). The tools are domain-appropriate and address a clear set of lint concerns (readability, grammar, completeness, tokens), but lack the production-grade polish of error recovery guidance and output schema declaration.

• Document output schemas for each tool. Add a 'Returns' section to every tool description listing field names, types, and meanings. E.g., 'Returns: {grade_level: number (0-18), sentence_count: integer, avg_words_per_sentence: number, issues: array of {position: integer, detail: string}}'
• Convert analyze_writing 'checks' parameter from free-form string to a constrained enum or array of enums. Document each valid check: readability, grammar, style, tone, spelling, etc.
• Add range constraints to numeric parameters. E.g., 'max_grade: Flesch-Kincaid grade level (0-18, default 8)' and 'passive_max: percentage (0-100, default 30)'.
• Explain the three templates in check_completeness. E.g., 'template="adr" validates Architecture Decision Record structure (context, decision, consequences, status); template="handoff" validates project handoff documents; template="design-doc" validates design specifications.'
• Document the file matching logic in lint_file. E.g., 'Rules are selected based on file extension (.md for markdown, .txt for plaintext) and content patterns defined in project settings. Call get_custom("rules") first to see active rules.'
• Explain dialect differences in analyze_writing. E.g., 'dialect="en-us" enforces American spellings (e.g., color, organize); dialect="en-gb" enforces British spellings (e.g., colour, organise).'
• Add error guidance. E.g., 'If token count exceeds the budget, the response includes excess_tokens count. Resubmit with shorter text or increase budget. If a file is not found, verify the path is relative to project root and try lint_file with text contents instead.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry