Single tool with minimal definition quality. The tool 'search_words' has a valid naming convention (starts with verb 'search'), but the implementation is critically underdeveloped. Tool description is present but vague (only 'Search for words in the dictionary', 40 chars, below ideal 50-200 char range). No output schema is documented; the implementation returns a hardcoded mock response ('Hello, {params}!') rather than actual word search results. No error handling, no parameter validation guidance, no composition awareness. The schema uses Zod validation (min length 1) but does not expose this in a way agents can introspect. Overall, this is a non-functional placeholder tool that fails multiple critical quality gates.
Search for words in the dictionary
Parameter lacks description. The 'params' parameter has no description in the tool definition, only a Zod validation message. LLMs cannot determine what values are valid or what the parameter controls.
Tool description is under 50 characters (40 chars: 'Search for words in the dictionary'). Must expand to 50-200 chars explaining WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, and any prerequisites.
Output schema is not documented. The tool returns hardcoded mock data ('Hello, {params}!') with no specification of the actual output format or fields. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations or extract meaningful data.
No error handling guidance. Tool provides no direction on what errors might occur, when to retry, or how to recover. Mock response always succeeds regardless of input validity.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 37 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 34 | - | v1 |
Mock implementation does not reflect actual tool behavior. The tool returns 'Hello, {params}!' instead of actual word dictionary results, making it useless for production or realistic agent testing.