This server has 2 tools with basic but incomplete definitions. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (get_alerts, get_forecast), which is good. However, descriptions lack context about when to use each tool vs. the other, parameter descriptions are minimal, and there is no documented output schema. The get_forecast description contains extraneous text ('HOLAAAAA') indicating incomplete code review. No input validation guidance, error handling narratives, or chaining information is present. Schemas are inferred from function signatures but lack explicit JSON Schema documentation in registration. This is below the median for production tools.

• Fix get_forecast description: remove 'HOLAAAAA', add clarity like 'Get a 5-day weather forecast for a specific latitude/longitude. Use this when you have coordinates; use get_alerts for state-level warnings.'
• Add enum constraint to state parameter in get_alerts: list all 50 US state codes (AL, AK, AZ, ..., WY) so LLMs know valid values.
• Document latitude and longitude ranges in get_forecast description: 'latitude: number between -90 and 90, longitude: number between -180 and 180'.
• Document output schema for both tools. Example for get_alerts: 'Returns a string containing formatted alerts. Each alert includes: Event (string), Area (string), Severity (string), Description (string), Instructions (string).' Consider returning structured JSON instead of formatted strings for LLM parsing.
• Add error recovery guidance: 'If state not found, try a neighboring state' for get_alerts; 'If coordinates invalid, verify they are within bounds (lat -90..90, lon -180..180)' for get_forecast.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50-150 chars each explaining the use case, expected output, and when to prefer one over the other.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry