The server contains a single tool 'generate_joke' with critical definition gaps. The tool has a description but it is generic and under-optimized for LLM selection. The input schema is completely empty (no parameters), which is acceptable for a truly parameter-less tool, but the tool itself lacks depth. The description ('This tool generate jokes. Use this tool to generate a joke when ever user is asking for a joke.') is 145 characters and present, but contains grammatical errors and lacks specificity about output format, idempotence guarantees, or when to prefer this tool over alternatives. There is no documented output schema, the function returns a string, but the LLM has no formal documentation of what that string contains or how to use it. The tool does not follow verb-noun naming convention ('generate_joke' is acceptable but could be 'create_joke' or 'get_joke_random' for clarity). Security and error handling are minimal, there is no rate limiting, no error classification, and no recovery guidance. The tool is simple enough that most issues are low-severity, but the lack of formal schema documentation and weak description hurt discoverability and agentic planning.
This tool generate jokes. Use this tool to generate a joke when ever user is asking for a joke.
Input schema is empty ({}), no parameters defined or documented. While acceptable for parameter-less tools, there is no formal schema documentation in code.
Output schema not documented. The function returns a string, but LLMs cannot see the structure or format of the returned joke. No formal return type schema visible in tool registration.
Description is generic and under-optimized for LLM selection. 'This tool generate jokes. Use this tool to generate a joke when ever user is asking for a joke.' (145 chars) lacks specificity about output format, tone, context, or when to use vs. alternatives. Contains grammatical errors ('generate' should be 'generates').
No error handling or recovery guidance. If the function fails or times out, there is no mechanism to tell the LLM how to recover or retry.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 6 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 35 | - | v1 |
Tool lacks idempotence guarantee documentation. No indication whether repeated calls return the same joke or different ones. This affects agent retry logic.