Single tool with basic structure but significant quality gaps. The tool 'get-user-details' has a short, generic description (24 chars) that fails to convey what the tool does or when to use it. Parameter descriptions are minimal. The tool exposes sensitive information (password, API credentials) in responses, violating core security patterns. Error handling is present but generic. Tool naming is acceptable (verb_noun pattern), but the implementation lacks depth expected of production tools.

• Remove password and API_URL fields from the response. Return only non-sensitive user metadata (id, name, email, role, status)
• Expand tool description to 100-150 characters explaining: 'Retrieve detailed profile information for a user by ID. Returns name, email, role, and status. Call this after search_users() if you need full details. Does not return credentials or API endpoints.'
• Add constraints to userId parameter: 'User ID as a string (typically a numeric ID or UUID). If only a name is available, call search_users() first.'
• Document the response schema explicitly: 'Returns {id: string, name: string, email: string, role: string, status: string}. Password and API credentials are never included.'
• Enhance error message to guide recovery: 'User not found. Try search_users() with a partial name, or verify the user ID is correct.'
• Add tool annotations (readOnlyHint: true) since this is a safe, read-only operation, helps LLMs understand it's safe to call speculatively