MCP server with OAuth authentication and remote authorization handling, built on Cloudflare Workers
The server exposes a single tool 'add' with minimal definition quality. While the tool has a name and basic description, it lacks production-grade documentation. The description is extremely brief (21 characters), parameters have minimal context, and there is no error handling guidance or output schema documentation. The tool does not follow agentic patterns for clarity, parameter specificity, or error recovery.
Adds two numbers together
Trivial tool description: 'Adds two numbers together' (21 chars) lacks context about when to use this tool, what happens on error, or any domain-specific guidance. Production tools average 194 chars.
Tool name 'add' does not follow verb_noun convention (e.g. 'add_numbers'). Generic action verbs like 'add' without object context are ambiguous when many tools are available.
No output schema documented. The response structure is visible in code (returns text content) but not declared in the tool definition. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations without knowing return fields.
Parameter descriptions present but minimal. 'First number to add' and 'Second number to add' do not specify format constraints, ranges, precision expectations, or invalid value guidance.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 5 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 37 | - | v1 |
No error handling guidance. Tool provides no information on what happens if parameters are invalid, non-numeric, or infinite. LLM has no recovery strategy.
Server purpose is unclear. A single 'add' tool is a demo/placeholder rather than a functional capability. No value proposition for agents or meaningful composition opportunity.