The server implements 4 tools with clear action verbs and structured schemas. Tool descriptions are present and moderately detailed (71-200 chars). Schemas are well-formed with typed parameters and enums. However, several parameters lack descriptions, error handling guidance is minimal, and output schemas are not documented. The tools show reasonable composition but miss critical LLM-facing details like actionable error messages and dependency hints.

• Document output schemas for all 4 tools. Specify returned fields, types, and what IDs/references are included for chaining. Example: 'generate_changelog returns {changelog_file_path, version, summary, change_count, processed_commits}'
• Add recovery guidance to error scenarios. For each tool, document what errors are retryable vs user-fixable. Example: 'If repositoryPath is invalid, return: error type=user_fixable message="Repository not found at {path}. Verify path exists and is a git repo."'
• Expand parameter descriptions with format, range, and constraints. Example: repositoryPath should state '(string, required if not run from repo root; resolves to absolute path)', since should state '(string; accepts git tag, commit SHA, or date in YYYY-MM-DD format)'
• Add tool dependency hints. In generate_changelog description, add: 'Tip: Call analyze_repository first to understand commit history and health metrics, which can inform versioning strategy.'
• Add tool annotations for destructive operations. Annotate generate_changelog with writeFile param as destructiveHint=true when writeFile=true. Offer a dryRun parameter to preview without writing.
• Document mutually exclusive parameters. In generate_changelog, state: 'since and tagRange are mutually exclusive; provide only one. If both given, tagRange takes precedence.'
• Return per-item success/failure in batch scenarios. If analyze_repository analyzes multiple branches/commits, return an array with per-item status, not a single error for one failure.