The auditPackage tool has a single responsibility but suffers from critical definition quality issues. The tool name 'auditPackage' uses camelCase instead of the verb_noun snake_case convention (should be 'audit_package'), which hampers LLM parsing. The description is in Chinese, limiting accessibility to English-speaking LLM contexts. Input parameters lack proper JSON Schema typing, they are defined as Zod strings but the schema object shown lacks explicit 'type' and 'required' fields in JSON Schema format. The parameters have Chinese descriptions which, while descriptive, are language-locked. No output schema is documented, the tool returns a text string but callers have no structured contract for what fields or structure to expect. Error handling is absent, the tool silently succeeds or throws unhandled exceptions with no recovery guidance. The tool modifies filesystem state (writes to savePath) but the description does not explicitly warn of this destructive behavior, violating the command-tool pattern. Overall, this is a minimal, functional definition that lacks production-grade polish.

• Rename tool from 'auditPackage' to 'audit_package' to follow verb_noun snake_case convention used by 90% of A+ production tools.
• Translate all descriptions and parameter docs to English for cross-language LLM interoperability. (Alternatively, provide both English and Chinese in separate tool registrations for specific localized deployments.)
• Add explicit JSON Schema type and required field declarations. Example: {type: 'object', properties: {projectRoot: {type: 'string', description: '...'}, savePath: {type: 'string', description: '...'}}, required: ['projectRoot', 'savePath']}
• Document the output schema formally. Example: 'Returns {content: [{type: "text", text: "Audit complete, results saved to <savePath>"}]}'.
• Prefix description with a clear intent statement: 'Audits all npm dependencies (direct and indirect) in a Node.js project for security vulnerabilities. Generates a markdown report.' Then document when to use it vs. alternatives.
• Update description to explicitly state this is a WRITE operation: 'Creates/updates an audit report file at the specified savePath. Side effect: writes to filesystem.'
• Add parameter constraint details: savePath must be an absolute path to a writable directory with .md filename; projectRoot must be a valid local directory path or https:// URL.
• Implement try-catch with actionable error messages. Examples: 'Unable to fetch remote repo: [reason]. Ensure URL is valid and public.' 'savePath not writable: [reason]. Check permissions and directory existence.' 'Invalid projectRoot format: expected absolute path or https://github.com/... URL.'