This server has 2 tools with significant definition gaps. Tool names follow verb_noun patterns (select_option, request_additional_info), which is positive. However, both tools lack critical parameter descriptions and neither tool has documented output schemas. Input schemas are present but minimal. Descriptions are present but generic (68-80 chars for select_option, 51 chars for request_additional_info), falling below the 194-char baseline for A+ tools. No parameter-level descriptions are visible in the code, the 'options' parameter and 'prompt' parameters have some description text in the schema, but these are thin and do not explain when to use the tool, what happens when called, or how the response should be interpreted. Error handling is not documented. The tools appear to be UI interaction helpers rather than API integrations, which is a valid niche, but the definitions lack the clarity needed for an LLM to reliably invoke them.

• Expand select_option description to 150+ chars: explain that this displays multiple choices to the user, waits for user input, and returns the selected option (or user-entered custom answer). Clarify whether it blocks execution and when to use it instead of direct user messaging.
• Expand request_additional_info description: state that it prompts the user for free-form input, what format the response takes (string, multiline, structured data), whether there is a timeout, and whether cancellation is possible.
• Document output schemas explicitly. For select_option, specify: returns {selected_index: int, selected_value: string} or similar. For request_additional_info, specify: returns {user_input: string} or {success: bool, response: string}.
• Add detailed parameter descriptions for 'options' in select_option: explain the exact dictionary structure (e.g., {title: string, description?: string} vs {name: string, ...}), whether indices are auto-generated, and what happens if options is empty.
• Add a parameter description for 'prompt' in request_additional_info: explain expected length, multiline support, character restrictions, and whether default text is shown.
• Document error handling: specify possible errors (e.g., user cancellation, timeout after 60s, invalid option), classify each as retryable or fatal, and provide recovery guidance.
• Add dependency hints: e.g., 'Call this after search_* tools to let the user disambiguate results.' This guides agent planning.
• Consider splitting responsibilities if these tools are often used together. If select_option and request_additional_info are always called in sequence, consider a combined 'get_user_choice_or_input' tool that reduces round-trips.