The server defines 3 tools with complete input schemas and descriptions. Tool naming follows verb_noun convention (describe-context, fetch-log, stream-log), though descriptions could be more concise for LLM optimization. Parameters are typed with constraints (enums, min/max for numeric values). However, parameter descriptions are sparse or missing for several fields. Output schemas are not formally documented. The server shows moderate quality, functional but with room for improvement in description depth and output schema documentation.

• Document output schemas for each tool. Define the shape of 'sessionPanes' (describe-context), 'lines'/'metadata'/'summary' (fetch-log), and 'StreamHandle' (stream-log) in the tool registration. This allows LLMs to plan chained calls.
• Add descriptions to all parameters lacking them: 'lines' in fetch-log should say 'Number of lines to capture from the pane output (default recommended: 100)'. 'filters' object should document each nested field (timeRange, keywords, levels) with purpose and format.
• Clarify paneHint format in describe-context. Specify: 'Pane ID (e.g., %1, %2) or session:window identifier (e.g., main:0) or pane title keyword. If multiple match, the topmost by recency is prioritized.'
• Add error guidance to tool descriptions. Example for fetch-log: 'If paneId is invalid, the tool returns an error with the detected valid pane IDs. If file does not exist, an error lists available log files in the working directory.'
• Reduce description length for fetch-log (currently 166 chars). Trim to ~80-100 chars focusing on the primary use case, and move enum rationale ('capture' vs 'file' vs 'stream') into parameter descriptions.
• Define idempotency and retry semantics. Are stream-log 'start' requests idempotent if called twice with same paneId? Can fetch-log be retried safely? Add tool annotations (if supported) to declare read-only behavior.