Single tool with minimal quality. The 'echo_tool' has a basic description (12 chars, below 20-char threshold) and a schema with only one parameter lacking meaningful context. No error handling, no parameter constraints, and the tool performs a trivial operation without demonstrating real-world utility. Tool naming is generic ('echo_tool' rather than verb_noun pattern). The description 'Echo the input text' is too short and provides no context for when an LLM should select it. Parameter description 'text parameter' is tautological and offers no guidance on format, range, or constraints. No output schema is documented. No security considerations. The server also exposes resources and prompts, but those are outside the tool evaluation scope.

• Expand tool description to 50-200 characters. Example: 'Echoes back the provided text string as-is. Use this to test text passthrough or verify that inputs are received correctly. Returns the exact input text without modification.'
• Replace parameter description 'text parameter' with actionable guidance: 'The input text to echo back. Accepts any UTF-8 string up to 10,000 characters. Special characters and whitespace are preserved.'
• Add documented output schema. Explicitly state: 'Returns: a JSON object with a single field echo_result (string) containing the input text.'
• Rename tool to follow verb_noun pattern: change 'echo_tool' to 'echo_text'.
• Add input validation: reject null/empty strings and strings exceeding length limits, returning a clear error message: 'Text parameter must not be empty and must be under 10,000 characters.'
• Implement error handling: catch any exceptions and return structured error responses with actionable guidance, e.g. 'Invalid input: {error details}. Ensure the text parameter is a valid UTF-8 string.'