Two read-only tools with minimal descriptions and no parameter constraints. Both tools have basic input schemas (type+properties+required) but descriptions are vague and generic. No output schemas documented. No error handling guidance. Parameter descriptions are minimal (6-7 words each). Tools follow verb_noun naming but lack depth expected for production. Schema completeness is present but output documentation absent.

• Expand echo description to ~100-150 chars: 'Echo back the provided text exactly as received. Useful for testing text transmission or confirming input capture. Maximum 10KB.'
• Expand reverse description to ~100-150 chars: 'Reverse the character order of the input text. Returns the reversed string. Useful for text transformation or validation testing. Maximum 10KB.'
• Add maxLength constraint to text parameter: {"type": "string", "maxLength": 10240, "description": "The text to process. Maximum 10,240 characters. UTF-8 encoding required."}
• Document the output schema in tool descriptions: 'Returns: {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "<result_string>"}]}' or reference it explicitly in the tool definition.
• Add error handling note to both tool descriptions: 'If text exceeds 10KB, returns an error. If text is empty, returns empty result.'
• Consider whether these tools should exist in production at all, they are trivial test utilities and add no business value. If retained, clearly label them as testing/debugging tools only.