The server provides 5 tools with explicit descriptions and input schemas. Most tools have verb-prefix naming (check_, monitor_, search_, get_) which is good. However, several critical gaps exist: parameter descriptions are minimal or absent, output schemas are not documented, error handling is unspecified, and tool compositions lack clear chaining documentation. The descriptions are adequate in length (ranging from ~80-180 chars) but lack WHEN/WHY guidance and prerequisite hints that LLMs need for tool selection. No tool annotations are present (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint), making it harder for agents to understand mutation semantics. The 'monitor_documentation' tool has a WRITE risk but its description does not explicitly state the side effect (storing data in vector DB). Input parameters have type declarations but descriptions are sparse or generic.

• Document complete output schemas for each tool. Example for search_documentation: { results: [{ id: string, url: string, chunk_number: int, content: string, metadata: object, similarity: float }], total: int, next_cursor?: string }
• Add tool annotations to the server registration. Mark monitor_documentation with { destructiveHint: true } (writes to vector DB). Mark read-only tools with { readOnlyHint: true }. Mark idempotent tools appropriately.
• Convert free-form parameter descriptions to enums and constraints. Example: status in get_monitored_urls should be enum ['active', 'inactive', 'all']. Add bounds: match_count [1-100], similarity_threshold [0.0-1.0].
• Enhance tool descriptions with WHEN/WHY guidance and prerequisites. Example: 'Search through indexed documentation. Call monitor_documentation() first to add and index a URL. Use similarity_threshold to filter low-confidence results (typical: 0.5-0.8).'
• Add error handling guidance to descriptions. Example for monitor_documentation: 'Returns error if URL is unreachable or unsupported format. If crawl fails, check URL validity and retry. Large sites may time out, consider breaking into smaller document chunks.'
• Document what chaining IDs/references are returned by each tool. If check_document_changes detects changes, what reference ID does get_document_changes need to fetch those changes? Return version_id from check, accept it in get.
• Add pagination documentation. Example for search_documentation: 'Results are paginated. Return next_cursor in response if more results exist. Agent can call again with cursor parameter to fetch next page.'

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry