This MCP server exposes 4 tools for remote MCP client interaction. All tools have basic descriptions and parameter schemas, but the definitions are thin and lack critical details for production use. Tool names are reasonably clear (callTool, readResource, getToolAccess, updateToolPolicy), but descriptions are generic and do not guide LLM decision-making. Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal (10-40 chars), falling well below the 72-char baseline. No output schemas are documented, forcing LLMs to guess what fields are returned. Error handling is not evident, no guidance on retryability, user-fixable errors, or recovery paths. The tools appear to be a client for a remote MCP server abstraction layer rather than direct domain tools, which introduces an extra layer of indirection and complicates testing and error diagnosis.

• Add explicit output schemas for each tool. Document what fields are returned, their types, and meanings. E.g., 'callTool returns {result: any, success: boolean, duration_ms: number, error?: string}'.
• Expand tool descriptions to 50-200 characters and include: (1) what the tool does, (2) when to use it (vs similar tools), (3) prerequisites (e.g., valid sessionId), (4) side effects (create/read/update/delete). Example: 'Execute a tool on a remote MCP server. Use this to delegate tasks to connected services. Requires a valid sessionId obtained via getToolAccess(). This may modify remote state, check tool documentation before calling.'
• Add rich parameter descriptions explaining format, valid values, and how to obtain them. E.g., 'sessionId (string): A session token returned by the MCP server during connection setup. Pass as-is; do not modify or share.'
• Document which tools are safe to retry and which are idempotent. Add idempotencyKey or similar for callTool to support safe retries.
• Add error handling examples: 'If sessionId is invalid, the tool returns {success: false, error: "Session expired. Call getToolAccess() to obtain a new session."}'. Guide LLMs to retry with fresh credentials.
• Constrain toolInput parameter with at least a schema reference or comment pointing to remote tool documentation. E.g., 'toolInput (object): Parameters for the target tool. Must match the schema of the tool named in toolName. See tool documentation for details.'
• Add a discovery tool (listTools or describeTools) to let LLMs inspect available remote tools before calling them, reducing invalid tool name errors.