Single tool 'randomInt' has a clear, concise description (90 chars) and properly typed schema with constraints. Naming follows verb_noun convention. However, the description lacks context about use cases and the parameter description is minimal. The tool is simple and well-formed for its domain, but lacks the depth expected for production-grade tooling. Schema is well-defined with proper integer type, minimum constraint, optional flag, and sensible default.

• Expand tool description from 90 chars to 150-250 chars by explaining: (1) What it does, (2) When an LLM should call it (e.g., 'when you need a random number for testing, sampling, or generating variety'), (3) What it returns
• Add description to 'max' parameter: currently says 'Exclusive upper bound for the random integer' but should clarify the behavior: 'Maximum value is exclusive (e.g., max=10 returns 0-9). Must be at least 1.'
• Document the return value structure in the tool description or as a separate schema: 'Returns a random integer as a string in the text field of the response'
• Consider adding error handling note: 'If max is less than 1, returns an error. Recommend validating max >= 1 before calling if composing with other tools'
• Add a brief note about idempotency (or lack thereof) if relevant: this is a read-only operation with no side effects, but each call produces a different result

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Stateful initialize / Mcp-Session-Id (removed; protocol is stateless) - make each request self-contained