Self-healing server-monitor FastAPI + LangGraph application with role-based agent orchestration and tool execution
Sentry provides 6 tools with explicit schemas and descriptions. Naming follows verb-noun patterns appropriately (read_file, grep_search, fetch_docs, run_diagnostics, apply_patch, restart_service). All tools have descriptions and documented input schemas. However, there are significant gaps: descriptions are brief (averaging ~80 chars, below the 194-char production baseline), parameter descriptions lack detail on constraints and valid ranges, output schemas are not documented, and error handling lacks recovery guidance. The tools themselves are well-scoped (single responsibility) and composition is sound, tool chains work (e.g., read_file → apply_patch). Security considerations are present (non-root container, permission checks mentioned in Dockerfile), but not explicitly enforced in tool parameters. Overall, Sentry meets basic definition requirements but lacks the polish and depth of production-grade tools.
Apply a diff patch to a file. Creates .bak backup.
Fetch documentation from approved domains.
Search for a regex pattern across project files.
Read contents of a file within the project root.
Restart the monitored service using the operator-configured command. No parameters needed — the restart command is set in the environment. Rate limited to 1 restart per 10 minutes.
Run a whitelisted diagnostic command.
Output schemas not documented for any tool. LLMs cannot infer what fields are returned, preventing downstream tool chaining and context planning.
Parameter descriptions lack actionable constraints. 'command' in run_diagnostics doesn't list whitelisted commands; 'query' in grep_search doesn't specify regex flavor; 'url' in fetch_docs lacks domain whitelist or size limits.
Error handling does not provide recovery guidance. Descriptions and schemas lack what to do if a file is not found, patch fails to apply, or restart times out. This leaves agents without actionable next steps.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | D | 58 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | D | 54 | - | v1 |
Descriptions are consistently below production baseline (194 chars). Average across tools is ~72 chars. fetch_docs (50 chars), run_diagnostics (50 chars), and grep_search (60 chars) lack WHEN to use and WHY (alternative tools, prerequisites).
No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) visible in tool definitions. Risk levels are documented in code comments but not exposed to the agent via tool metadata.
apply_patch and restart_service are reversible/irreversible operations. Descriptions do not mention confirmation steps or dry-run mode for safety.