Single tool with minimal viable definition. Tool is explicitly registered via @mcp.tool decorator in main.py with a docstring, but the schema is entirely empty (no input parameters), description is extremely brief (9 words), and there is no output schema documentation. The tool does one thing (generate random number) which is good for composition, but lacks the rigor expected of production tools. No parameter descriptions, no input constraints, no output structure documentation, no error handling guidance.
Generate a random number between 1 and 100.
Empty input schema with no parameters defined or described
Tool description is only 9 words (9 chars), far below the 10 - 1024 character baseline; provides no context on when to use this tool or what the return value represents
No documented output schema; LLM cannot determine the return type or structure (is it an integer? object with metadata?)
No error handling or recovery guidance; if random generation fails, LLM has no instruction on what to do
Tool name 'random_number' does not start with an action verb (get_, generate_, create_). Weak naming makes intent unclear.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 33 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 31 | - | v1 |