The server defines 8 tools with explicit registrations in server.py, all with schemas and descriptions. However, multiple critical issues significantly limit quality: (1) Tool names lack action verbs, 'rustchain_health', 'rustchain_epoch', 'rustchain_miners', 'rustchain_bounties', 'bottube_stats' are all noun-heavy and do not start with verbs like 'get_', 'list_', or 'check_'. This violates the core naming pattern and forces LLMs to infer intent rather than reading it from the name. (2) Descriptions are extremely short (23-78 chars), well below the 50-200 char guideline for LLM-optimized descriptions. Example: 'Check RustChain node health status, version, uptime, and database status' (71 chars) lacks context on WHEN to call this vs other tools, what the output structure is, or prerequisites. (3) Parameters are minimally described. 'wallet_id' has a description but lacks format guidance (is 'RTC...' a hard constraint? What's the character range?). 'to_address' and 'query' lack any format or validation hints. (4) No output schemas are documented. Callers do not know what fields to expect from rustchain_health, rustchain_epoch, or the search results. (5) Error handling is generic ('Error: {str(e)}') with no guidance to the LLM on retry strategy, root cause, or recovery. (6) The rustchain_transfer tool explicitly admits it cannot function via MCP ('requires wallet signing'), this is a design flaw that should be either removed or redesigned with proper signing ceremony. (7) No pagination documented for list tools (rustchain_miners, rustchain_bounties), if these return large result sets, context blowup is unmanaged. (8) No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint) are present, forcing LLMs to infer which calls are safe to retry. The server is functional but immature for production use.

• Rename tools to follow verb_noun pattern: 'rustchain_health' → 'get_rustchain_health' or 'check_rustchain_node_status'; 'rustchain_epoch' → 'get_rustchain_epoch'; 'rustchain_miners' → 'list_rustchain_miners'; 'rustchain_bounties' → 'list_rustchain_bounties'; 'bottube_stats' → 'get_bottube_stats'.
• Expand descriptions to 50 - 200 chars with WHEN and HOW context. Example: 'Get the current RustChain epoch number, slot, enrolled miner count, and reward pot balance. Call this to check network state or verify current incentive pool before initiating transfers. Returns: epoch (int), slot (int), miners_enrolled (int), reward_pot (float RTC).'
• Document output schema for each tool. Create a structured response model (e.g., HealthStatus with fields: node_status, version, uptime_seconds, database_status) and return it from call_tool as JSON instead of plain text. Include field types and descriptions.
• Remove or redesign rustchain_transfer. If signing cannot be done server-side, either (a) remove the tool entirely and document that token transfers must be done via the rustchain_langchain SDK directly, or (b) split into two tools: 'generate_unsigned_transfer' (returns a JSON payload) and 'confirm_transfer' (requires user approval/signature and submits on-chain).
• Add format constraints to parameters. Example for 'wallet_id': 'RustChain wallet address (format: RTC[40-42 hex characters], e.g. RTCd1e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9g0h1i2j3k4l5m6n7o8p9q)'. Example for 'query': 'Search term (1 - 100 chars, alphanumeric and spaces only)'.