Scoring was not performed

• Rewrite create_filespace_browser description to ~100-150 characters: 'Creates a standalone web application for browsing filespace contents. Writes files, installs dependencies, starts server, opens browser automatically.' Keep imperative guidance out, let the name and description speak.
• Add explicit descriptions for each input parameter: output_dir: 'Directory where the web app files are written. Defaults to ~/Desktop/filespace-browser. Must be writable by the current user.' port: 'HTTP port to run the server on (default: 3099). Must be between 1024 and 65535 and not already in use.'
• Document the output schema in the tool description or as a structured example: 'Returns {success: boolean, server_url: string, output_path: string, port: number, error?: string}'
• Consider splitting create_filespace_browser into two tools: (1) generate_filespace_browser (generates code, returns file paths) and (2) start_filespace_browser (starts server, opens browser). This violates single-responsibility and gives agents finer control.
• Add error handling guidance in the description: 'If port is in use, choose a different port and retry. If file write fails, check directory permissions. If npm install fails, ensure Node.js 18+ is installed.'
• Add timeout and retry guidance: Document that server startup waits up to 30 seconds; if browser doesn't open, the server may still be running at the printed URL.
• Remove prescriptive instructions ('do NOT build a UI manually, always use this tool') from description. Let the tool's purpose speak for itself; LLMs will use it appropriately based on context.