Scoring was not performed
Tools are defined in generated BAML code, not explicit MCP tool registration. Tool definitions are inferred from async function signatures rather than being directly visible as MCP ToolDescription objects with explicit schema and description fields.
Parameter descriptions are incomplete or missing. 'tool' param in GenerateCodeSnippet has a description, but 'args' array items lack descriptions. 'query' and 'manifest' in MatchCapability lack granular descriptions for nested object properties. 'tools' array in SummarizeCapabilities lacks item descriptions.
Output schemas are not documented. None of the three tools document what they return. GenerateCodeSnippet returns 'CodeSnippet' type, MatchCapability returns ranked candidates, SummarizeCapabilities returns categorized capabilities, but no descriptions of output structure are visible in the code.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | F | 38 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
| 2026-03-09 | F | 44 | - | v1 |
No error handling patterns visible. No evidence of recovery guidance, error classification (retryable/user-fixable/fatal), or actionable error messages. LLMs calling these tools will receive raw exceptions without guidance on what to do next.
Tool descriptions are generic and under-optimized for LLM selection. 'Generate a minimal, practical Python code snippet' does not explain WHEN to use this tool vs others, what prerequisites are needed, or what dependencies the generated snippet has. Descriptions lack context-setting details required by pattern:tool-description.
Complex nested schemas (manifest object in MatchCapability with servers and clis arrays containing multiple properties) lack documentation. Nested properties like 'requires_api_key', 'env_var', 'keywords' have no descriptions explaining their purpose or expected format.