The server defines 23 tools with moderate consistency in naming and description. Tool names follow verb_noun convention (check_*, get_*, list_*, create_*, delete_*, update_*, scale_*, upgrade_*), which is strong. All tools have descriptions (10 - 200 chars range, mostly 80 - 150). Input schemas are visible and include type declarations. However, there are systematic gaps: (1) parameter descriptions are minimal (1-2 lines), lacking detail on format constraints, valid ranges, or dependencies; (2) no output schemas are documented anywhere in the visible code, forcing LLMs to infer result structure; (3) error handling guidance is absent from tool descriptions, no indication of what errors are retryable, user-fixable, or fatal; (4) no enumeration of allowed values for multi-choice parameters (e.g., storage_policy accepts a string with no enum constraint, inviting hallucinated values); (5) the confirm parameter pattern on write operations is good (gates destructive changes), but the preview/dry-run behavior is not described in the descriptions themselves, only in the code comments. Tool composition is strong (single-responsibility per tool, good chaining through target/namespace/cluster_name parameters), but lack of output documentation undermines downstream tool discovery. Security posture is solid (stdio only, no credentials in params, audit logging mentioned in code), but this is not a definition-quality criterion. The rubric baseline for 550+ production tools averages 194 chars for descriptions and 72 chars for param annotations; this server is ~120 chars for descriptions and ~40 chars for param annotations, suggesting descriptions are present but terse.

• Document output schemas for all 23 tools in their descriptions. Include field names, types, and nested structure. Example: 'Returns {status: string, version: string, node_count: integer, ready_replicas: integer}'.
• Add enum constraints to all multi-choice parameters. E.g., storage_policy should enumerate valid policy names available on the Supervisor; version should list valid upgrade targets (call get_tkc_available_versions first to populate). Use JSON Schema enum property.
• Expand list tool signatures to include limit (default 20, max 100) and offset/next_cursor parameters. Document that results are capped per the mxe:enforce-result-limits pattern. Return a total_count or next_cursor in the output schema.
• Increase parameter description length to 50 - 100 chars each. Add format constraints: 'worker_count: integer, 1 - 100 workers'; 'cluster_name: string, 1 - 63 alphanumeric + hyphen'; 'version: string, e.g., 1.28.2 or v1.28'.
• Add error recovery guidance to tool descriptions for destructive operations. E.g., delete_namespace: 'Rejects if TKC clusters exist inside. Call list_tkc_clusters() to find them, then delete_tkc_cluster() before retrying delete_namespace.'
• Document idempotence semantics in descriptions. E.g., create_namespace: 'Idempotent, safe to retry. Returns error if namespace exists (error code ALREADY_EXISTS).' upgrade_tkc_cluster: 'Non-idempotent, errors if already at target version.'
• Specify kubeconfig output format explicitly. E.g., 'Returns kubeconfig as Base64-encoded YAML string' or 'Returns kubeconfig as raw YAML (do not echo to user, contains credentials)'. Add note per pattern:secret-injection that response should not be logged or echoed.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry