MalikClaw provides 2 tools focused on searching/discovering hidden tools. Both tools have descriptions and basic input schemas, but critical quality issues prevent a higher score: (1) tool names lack action verbs, 'tool_search_tool_regex' and 'tool_search_tool_bm25' are repetitive and confusing; a user cannot infer the distinction from the names alone. (2) Descriptions are generic and do not explain when to use one search method over the other, or what 'hidden tools' means. (3) Parameter descriptions lack format/constraint guidance (e.g., regex syntax requirements, query language details). (4) Output schemas are not visible in the source, only noted as 'Returns JSON schemas of discovered tools' without documenting the actual response structure (fields, types, pagination). (5) No error handling guidance, what happens if regex is invalid? If no tools match? (6) The tools are discovery/introspection only, no actual functional tools for agents to invoke, which limits practical utility. The server appears to be a meta-tool for exposing other tools dynamically, but the implementation quality is below production baseline.

• Rename tools to action-verb conventions: 'search_tools_by_regex' and 'search_tools_by_semantic_query' (or 'search_tools_regex' and 'search_tools_nlp'). This makes the distinction immediate and lets the LLM infer the search method from the name.
• Expand tool descriptions to 80-200 chars each, explaining: (1) What the tool does (regex vs semantic matching). (2) WHEN to use it (regex for precise name/description matches; BM25 for fuzzy capability matching). (3) What it returns (array of tool schemas with names, descriptions, input/output).
• Add parameter constraints to the schema: pattern.description should state regex dialect (Go regexp syntax), max length (e.g., 1000 chars), and note that invalid regex will fail. query.description should note natural language requirements and max length.
• Document the output schema explicitly: return type should be an object with fields like { tools: [ { name: string, description: string, inputSchema: object, ... } ], total: number, truncated: boolean }. Include example response.
• Add error handling guidance to both tools: 'If pattern is invalid, the tool returns an error with the regex parse failure. Try simplifying the pattern. If no tools match, try a broader pattern or use the semantic search variant.'
• Consider adding pagination parameters (limit, offset/cursor) to prevent oversized responses if many hidden tools exist.
• Add tool annotations (readOnlyHint: true) to both tools to signal they are safe discovery operations with no side effects.

Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.

• Relies on Logging (deprecated) - log to stderr or use OpenTelemetry