YouTube MCP server providing video transcripts, search, metadata, channel info, playlists, comments, engagement analysis, and more
The YouTube MCP server demonstrates solid definition quality with consistent naming patterns, comprehensive descriptions, and well-structured input schemas across all 17 tools. All tools follow verb_noun naming convention (get_, search_, parse_, extract_, analyze_). Descriptions are detailed (average ~150-200 chars) and explain WHAT the tool does and WHEN to use it. Input schemas are complete with proper JSON Schema structure including enums for constrained parameters (e.g., search_videos has enum constraints for order, duration, upload_date, type). However, output schemas are NOT documented anywhere in the provided code, a significant gap. Error handling guidance is absent; tools do not indicate what to do on failure (e.g., when 50K+ view requirement is not met for get_most_replayed). All parameters have descriptions, and most have appropriate type constraints. The main weakness is lack of output documentation and error recovery patterns.
Analyze engagement metrics for a YouTube video including like ratio, comment sentiment, and viewer retention insights.
Extract chapter timestamps from a YouTube video's description. Returns structured chapter list with titles and start times.
Get YouTube channel information: title, description, subscriber/video/view counts, country, and thumbnail. Accepts channel URL, @handle, or channel ID.
Get recent videos from a YouTube channel. Supports sorting by date or view count.
Fetch a YouTube video transcript with sponsor reads, intros, outros, self-promotion, and filler removed using SponsorBlock data. Ideal for summarization.
Get the "most replayed" heatmap data for a YouTube video, showing which parts viewers rewatch most. Returns intensity scores and top peaks with timestamps. Requires 50K+ views.
No output schemas documented for any tool. LLMs cannot determine what fields to expect in responses, forcing them to guess at downstream data extraction and chaining.
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tool descriptions do not explain what happens on failure (e.g., get_most_replayed requires 50K+ views but provides no guidance if requirement is not met). Tools should state: retryable vs fatal, and what the LLM should do next.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 57 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
Get all videos in a YouTube playlist with metadata. Returns playlist info and video list with titles, channels, and positions.
Fetch the full transcript/captions of a YouTube video with timestamps. Returns both individual segments with timing and the full concatenated text. No API key needed.
Get currently trending/popular YouTube videos by region and category.
Get the YouTube category ID for a given category name.
Get comments on a YouTube video with support for sorting and filtering.
Get detailed metadata for a YouTube video: title, description, channel, duration, view/like/comment counts, tags, category, thumbnails, and more.
Parse any YouTube URL format and extract video ID, channel ID, playlist ID, handle, and timestamp. Supports youtube.com/watch, youtu.be, /shorts/, /embed/, /playlist, /channel/, /@handle, and bare video IDs.
Search within a YouTube video's transcript for a keyword or phrase. Returns matching segments with timestamps and surrounding context.
Search YouTube for videos with full filter support: upload date, duration, sort order, and content type.
Search for videos within a specific YouTube channel.
Generate a summary of a YouTube video using its transcript.
Some tools lack pagination support in descriptions. search_videos, get_video_comments, and others accept max_results but do not document next_page/cursor mechanism or total count. Large result sets could overflow context.
get_most_replayed description mentions '50K+ views' requirement but does not indicate what happens if requirement is not met (error, partial data, empty response). Ambiguous prerequisites cause LLM retry loops.
get_video_category_id description (69 chars) is below baseline. It states what the tool does but lacks context on when to call it and what format it returns. Should mention enum values or link to YouTube's category taxonomy.
analyze_engagement description is vague ('engagement metrics', 'comment sentiment', 'viewer retention insights'). Does not specify output format, whether it returns a score, structured data, or natural language. LLM cannot plan downstream use.