Loading ToolBench
AI agent components for RuleGo framework, supporting multi-tool integration including bash shell execution, rule chain tools, MCP servers, and skill management
The server exposes a single 'bash' tool for shell command execution. While the tool has a description and parameter schemas are present, the quality is significantly constrained by: (1) the tool performs a single destructive operation (shell execution) rather than composable, domain-specific actions; (2) parameter descriptions exist but are generic and lack concrete constraints, error recovery guidance, or safety guardrails; (3) no output schema is documented; (4) no error handling guidance or classification; (5) critical security concerns around command injection and unrestricted shell access; (6) the tool name 'bash' is not verb-action oriented and conflates the transport mechanism with the semantic action. This is a foundational tool that most production agents would heavily constrain or replace with safer domain tools.
Shell command execution tool. Executes shell commands and returns results. Supports pipes (|), chains (&&, ||), and redirects (>). Current platform: Linux/macOS/Windows with platform-specific shell commands. Timeout: configurable seconds. Output exceeds max bytes will be truncated.
Tool name does not follow verb_noun convention and is not action-oriented. 'bash' names the transport/shell, not the semantic action (e.g., 'execute_command', 'run_shell_script'). This violates the naming principle that the name alone should convey intent.
No output schema documented. The tool description mentions 'returns results' and 'Output exceeds max bytes will be truncated' but provides no structured schema for what fields/types the LLM should expect. This forces the LLM to infer output shape and breaks downstream tool chaining.
Parameters lack actionable constraints. The 'timeout' parameter has no min/max bounds (e.g., 1-3600 seconds). The 'command' parameter has no length limit, no character whitelist, and no injection-prevention guidance. The 'work_dir' has no validation rules (absolute vs. relative, allowed base dirs).
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 40 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No error handling guidance or recovery instructions. A failed command (exit code non-zero) returns what? stderr? Both stdout and stderr? An error code alone? The description provides no classification (retryable, user-fixable, fatal) or next-step guidance for the agent.
Severe security vulnerability: no validation or sandboxing of shell commands. The tool accepts arbitrary shell syntax including pipes, redirects, and chains, exposing it to command injection, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration. There is no per-command permission check, no audit trail declaration, and no scope boundaries.
No confirmation mechanism for destructive operations. The tool can delete files, modify the filesystem, kill processes, and write to sensitive locations. No dry-run option, no before-execute confirmation, and no compensation tools to undo errors.
Parameter descriptions are vague and lack concrete examples of valid input. 'Shell command to execute' does not specify whether pipes, redirects, and chains are actually safe or if there are hidden restrictions. The work_dir description 'Defaults to tool configuration working directory' does not specify what that directory is or how to override it safely.
Tool performs multiple concerns in one interface: execution, input/output handling, error reporting, and resource cleanup. This violates the single-responsibility principle and makes it unsafe to delegate to untrusted agents.