The server has 6 tools, all well-named with action verbs (get_, search_, compare_, find_). Descriptions are strong and contextual (160-280 chars), clearly explaining when to use each tool and what it returns. Input schemas are fully defined with proper types, enums, min/max constraints, and descriptions. However, output schemas are not formally documented in the code, responses are markdown-formatted text without explicit response shape declarations. Tool annotations (readOnlyHint) are present for all tools, which is excellent. The main gap is lack of structured output documentation and formal error handling patterns. Overall execution is above-average for community MCP servers.

• Add formal output schema to each tool definition: declare that responses are markdown strings containing firm name, discount %, code, profit split, etc. If responses include structured JSON, document the shape (fields, types, required).
• Document error conditions and recovery: 'If firm not found, returns error with list of available firms. Agent should suggest alternatives to user.' Add this to pfdf_get_firm_details, pfdf_compare_firms, pfdf_get_discount_code.
• Remove example firm names from parameter descriptions. Instead, state 'Partial name matching is supported, common firms: FTMO, Bulenox, TradeDay' in tool description, not parameter description.
• Clarify truncation behavior: 'If response exceeds 25,000 characters, shows top N results and provides link to full list. Use limit parameter to control result count.'
• Document that all tools are read-only and idempotent. The readOnlyHint annotation is present in code (good), but descriptions should state this for LLM clarity.