MCP server implementing a sliding context window skill for managing and trimming message histories
The 'execute_skill_action' tool has a vague, non-actionable description ('Execute a skill action (declared in mcp_server.py supported_tools)'). No input schema is visible in the source code, the tool definition is inferred rather than explicitly registered with JSON Schema. The tool name 'execute_skill_action' uses generic verbs ('execute', 'action') that lack specificity. No parameter descriptions, type definitions, or output schema are documented. The server prints a JSON handshake but does not implement the MCP protocol, it outputs a single JSON blob and exits rather than opening a stateful or request-response communication channel. This is not a functional MCP server implementation.
Execute a skill action (declared in mcp_server.py supported_tools)
No input schema visible in source code. The tool 'execute_skill_action' is mentioned in a string array but has no explicit JSON Schema definition with types, required fields, or parameter descriptions.
Tool description is vague and circular ('Execute a skill action (declared in mcp_server.py supported_tools)'). Does not explain WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, or WHAT it returns. Fails pattern:tool-description.
Tool name 'execute_skill_action' is generic and non-specific. Uses action verbs 'execute' and 'action' which are vague. LLM cannot infer intent from the name alone. Pattern:tool recommends verb_noun pattern (get_*, create_*, update_*, delete_*, search_*, list_*) or specific action names.
Server does not implement the MCP protocol correctly. mcp_server.py prints a single JSON handshake and exits. MCP requires a persistent request-response loop (STDIO with JSON-RPC 2.0, or HTTP with SSE). The server cannot accept tool calls or handle agent requests.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 12 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No parameter descriptions or type constraints. Tool 'execute_skill_action' accepts 0 documented parameters, but the expected inputs (skill name? action name? parameters?) are nowhere defined.
No output schema documented. Tool response structure is not specified. LLM cannot plan downstream calls or extract relevant data.
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tool provides no hints about failure modes, retryability, or remediation.