Evaluates return window constraints and item condition policies to approve/deny refunds.
Single tool with basic structure but significant gaps in definition quality. The tool has a clear, verb-based name ('check_eligibility') and a concise description (87 chars), which is solid. Input schema is present with proper JSON Schema structure including types and descriptions for all parameters. However, output schema is not formally documented in the MCP server registration, it is only implicitly visible in the client.py code. The tool lacks error categorization guidance, does not document the structure of response fields, and missing descriptions for valid enum values (e.g., what does 'unopened' vs 'opened_unused' vs 'opened_used' vs 'damaged' mean to business logic). No tool annotations present (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint). The parameter descriptions are adequate but could be more precise about constraints and business rules. No evidence of error recovery guidance or input validation patterns.
Evaluates return window constraints and item condition policies to approve/deny refunds.
Output schema not formally documented in MCP registration. Response structure (status, reason fields) is inferred from code only.
Enum parameter 'item_condition' has no enumeration constraint in schema. Valid values (unopened, opened_unused, opened_used, damaged) must be formally declared as enum.
Enum parameter 'product_category' lacks enumeration constraint. Description says 'etc.' but does not list all valid values (general, underwear, swimwear, perishables, cosmetics, electronics, etc.)
Error responses do not provide actionable recovery guidance. 'Invalid date format parsed' gives no hint on correct ISO 8601 format. 'Requires support review' offers no next step for the agent.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 59 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No tool annotations present. Tool should be marked with 'readOnlyHint: true' and 'idempotentHint: true' since it performs a pure eligibility check with no side effects.
Parameter descriptions lack business rule context. 'product_category' description does not explain why 'underwear' and 'swimwear' are non-returnable unless unopened, agents cannot infer business logic from names alone.
Date format constraint is stated as 'ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD)' in description but not encoded in schema as a regex pattern or format field.