Loading ToolBench
MCP server for managing local quantized language model instances with zero network leakage verification
This server has a single tool 'execute_skill_action' with virtually no definition. The tool name is vague (does not start with a clear action verb like 'run_', 'invoke_', or 'execute_'), the description is generic (16 chars, below the 20-char minimum), and no input schema is visible in the source code. The mcp_server.py file contains only a stub that prints a JSON status message, it does not register tools with schemas, parameter definitions, or output specifications. Tool definitions appear to be inferred rather than explicitly declared. The server is non-functional as an MCP implementation.
Execute a skill action on the quantized model runtime
No input schema visible for execute_skill_action. Tool registration is missing parameter definitions, types, and constraints.
Tool description is 16 characters ('Execute a skill action on the quantized model runtime'), below the 20-char minimum. This description lacks WHEN to use it, WHAT it returns, and any prerequisites.
Tool name 'execute_skill_action' is vague and does not follow verb_noun convention clearly. 'execute' is generic; a name like 'run_quantized_inference' or 'invoke_model_action' would be more specific and help LLMs infer intent.
No parameter descriptions visible. The tool accepts parameters (implied by 'skill action') but none are documented. LLMs cannot infer what parameters are required, their types, or valid values.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 21 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No output schema documented. LLMs need to know what fields the tool returns so they can plan downstream calls and extract data. The client.py example shows a response structure, but this is not formally declared in the MCP server.