This server has severe definition quality issues. Tool 1 (execute_skill_action) lacks any visible input schema in the source code, only a description is provided. Tool 2 (synthesize_typographic_graphic_poster) has a basic schema with three parameters, but descriptions are generic and lack actionable guidance. Neither tool documents output schemas. The server provides no error handling, validation guidance, or recovery paths. Tool names are vague ('execute_skill_action') and do not follow verb_noun conventions clearly. No security considerations, no pagination, no idempotent guarantees. This is a minimal proof-of-concept, not production-grade.

• Add explicit input schema to execute_skill_action with typed parameters and descriptions. Currently invisible in source.
• Document output schemas for both tools. Specify all returned fields, types, and what they represent (e.g., graphic_job_id is a string identifier for tracking).
• Convert design_theme parameter to an enum: ['SWISS_INTERNATIONAL_TYPOGRAPHIC_STYLE', 'BAUHAUS_MINIMALIST_VECTOR', ...]. Add min/max bounds to output_dpi (e.g., 72 - 600).
• Rewrite tool descriptions to answer: What does it do? When should the LLM call it? What does it return? E.g., 'Synthesize a typographic poster from headline text and design theme. Returns a print-ready PNG URL and SVG outlines. Use this when the user requests a graphic design.'
• Add error handling: document what happens if headline_text is empty, design_theme is invalid, or rendering fails. Provide recovery guidance (e.g., 'If rendering fails, try a shorter headline or different theme').