This server has severe definition quality issues. Tool 1 (execute_skill_action) has no visible input schema or parameter documentation. Tool 2 (orchestrate_multi_file_semantic_refactor) has a basic schema with only 2 parameters, both strings with minimal descriptions. Neither tool has descriptions that explain WHEN to use them, WHAT they return, or error recovery paths. The descriptions are under 100 chars and lack actionable context. No output schemas are documented. No error handling guidance. The server appears to be a mock/stub implementation rather than a production-ready MCP server.

• Add explicit input schema to execute_skill_action with typed parameters and descriptions. Currently invisible, cannot score above 0.
• Add a description to execute_skill_action explaining what it does, when to call it, and what it returns. Currently missing entirely.
• Split orchestrate_multi_file_semantic_refactor into 3 focused tools: (1) analyze_files_for_refactor (returns AST analysis), (2) preview_refactor_diff (returns speculative diff), (3) apply_refactor_diffs (applies changes). Each should have a single responsibility.
• Document the output schema for both tools. Specify that orchestrate_multi_file_semantic_refactor returns {composer_task_id: string, target_path: string, files_analyzed_count: int, atomic_diff_blocks_applied: int, ast_syntax_integrity_verified: bool, speculative_diff_preview_url: string, git_commit_ready: bool}.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If AST verification fails, return the specific syntax errors and suggest manual review. If diff preview fails, return available alternatives. If apply fails, offer a rollback tool.'