MCP server for planning robotic manipulation trajectories using visuomotor policies with RGB-depth-tactile fusion for deformable object handling
Critical failures across all dimensions. The single tool 'execute_skill_action' has no visible input schema, no parameter descriptions, and a generic description (58 chars). The mcp_server.py file contains only a stub that prints JSON and does not implement the MCP protocol, no tool registration, no request/response handling, no schema definitions. The client.py and example_usage.py files are disconnected from the MCP server and do not define the tool interface. No error handling, no output schema documentation, and no evidence of actual MCP protocol compliance.
Execute a robotic manipulation skill action with visuomotor trajectory planning
No input schema visible for execute_skill_action. Tool definition is inferred from name only; no JSON Schema with parameter types, descriptions, or constraints.
Tool description is generic and too short (58 chars). Does not explain WHAT the tool does, WHEN to use it, or what it returns. LLMs cannot determine when to select this tool.
No parameter documentation. The tool likely accepts parameters (robot_embodiment_type, natural_language_instruction visible in client.py) but none are described in the MCP server definition.
No output schema documented. The client.py shows a response structure (trajectory_plan_id, robot_hardware, task_instruction, etc.) but this is not exposed in the MCP tool definition.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 19 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tool has WRITE risk but no confirmation pattern, dry-run option, or error classification (retryable vs fatal).