YeepForge exposes only one tool: set_engagement. The tool has a complete JSON Schema with 9 properties (8 optional, 1 required), and a description of 227 characters explaining its purpose. However, the description lacks critical context about when to call it, what it returns, and how it interacts with downstream tools. The schema is well-structured with type strings and individual parameter descriptions (10-80 chars each), meeting baseline requirements. The tool name 'set_engagement' uses a verb but is vague, 'configure_engagement' or 'set_scan_target' would be clearer. No error handling guidance is documented. The tool is marked WRITE risk, but no confirmation or dry-run pattern is offered. Overall, the single tool meets minimum schema standards but falls short of production-grade documentation and composition patterns.

• Rename 'set_engagement' to 'configure_scan_target' and add 2-3 sentences explaining: (1) what it does, (2) when to call it (before any scan), (3) what it returns (e.g., 'Returns engagement_id and confirms target is reachable').
• Document the return schema explicitly: 'Returns {engagement_id: string, target_reachable: boolean, auth_verified: boolean}' so LLMs know what fields to expect.
• Add error handling guidance: 'If target_url is unreachable, returns error with HTTP status. Retry with a different proxy or ask user to verify connectivity.'
• Replace example values in parameter descriptions with format constraints. E.g., 'cookies: HTTP cookie string (format: name=value; name2=value2)' instead of showing 'sessionid=abc'.
• Add a 'dry_run' boolean parameter (default false) so agents can preview the engagement configuration before committing it.