Server has 13 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern) and basic schemas. However, descriptions are minimal (avg ~80 chars, well below the 194-char baseline), parameter descriptions are sparse or missing, and output schemas are entirely undocumented. Error handling is present but generic. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint/destructiveHint) despite clear risk stratification. Composition is sound (single responsibility per tool), but parameter constraints are weak, no enums, ranges, or format specs. This is a typical community server: functional but underspecified for reliable LLM interaction.

• Document output schema for every tool. Example for list_packages: 'Returns array of {id: string, name: string, version: string, shortText: string}'. This enables LLMs to chain tools correctly.
• Add tool annotations to all tools. Use destructiveHint: true for deploy_artifact and undeploy_artifact; readOnlyHint: true for all others. This signals operation safety to the LLM.
• Convert artifactType description to a formal enum in the schema: {type: 'string', enum: ['IntegrationFlow', 'MessageMapping', 'ScriptCollection', 'ValueMapping']}. Remove the enum list from the description text.
• Add pagination to list tools: add 'limit' (1-100, default 20) and 'offset' (default 0) parameters. Return {items: [...], total: number, hasMore: boolean} to enable safe iteration over large result sets.
• Enhance error messages with recovery hints. Example: if get_artifact returns 404, append 'Try list_artifacts(packageId) to find valid artifact IDs.' This guides the LLM to self-correct.