MCP server for batch exporting creative assets in multiple aspect ratios
Critical failures across all dimensions. The single tool 'execute_skill_action' has a reasonable name and basic schema structure, but the implementation is fundamentally broken. The mcp_server.py file does NOT implement the MCP protocol, it merely prints a JSON status message and exits. There is no actual tool registration, no request/response handling, no parameter validation, and no error handling. The tool definition exists only in the rubric description, not in executable code. The client.py file is a standalone Python class unconnected to the MCP server. This is not a functional MCP server.
Execute batch export of creative assets in multiple aspect ratios
MCP server does not implement the protocol. mcp_server.py prints a static JSON message and exits; it does not handle incoming requests, parse tool calls, or return results. The server is non-functional.
No tool registration mechanism. Tools are not registered with the MCP server via a tools/list response or equivalent. Tool definitions exist only in documentation, not in code.
Tool description is vague and lacks actionable context. 'Execute batch export of creative assets in multiple aspect ratios' does not explain WHEN to use this tool, what prerequisites exist, or what the output contains. Baseline: 194 chars average; this is ~80 chars.
Parameter descriptions are minimal. 'source_master_asset' lacks format guidance (file path? URL? asset ID?). 'target_aspect_ratios' does not specify valid formats, constraints, or examples beyond the description text.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 37 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No output schema documented. The tool returns URLs and metadata, but the response structure is not formally defined. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations without knowing the output shape.