Production-grade state checkpoint and transaction recovery engine for multi-step agent workflows with SHA-256 hashing and rollback support
Single tool with critical definition gaps. Tool name 'commit_state_checkpoint' is verb-noun compliant, but input schema is present in code but NOT exposed in tools/list response. The tools/list handler returns only name and description, no inputSchema field. Parameter descriptions exist in client.py signature but are not declared in the MCP schema. Output schema is undocumented. Description (67 chars) is below the 194-char baseline and lacks WHEN/WHY context. No error handling guidance, no idempotency declaration, no security considerations for state mutation.
Commit state checkpoint with SHA-256 hash and rollback transaction support.
Input schema not exposed in MCP protocol response. tools/list returns only name and description; inputSchema field is missing. Per HARD SCORING RULE, schema score must be 0.
Tool description is 67 characters (below 194-char baseline) and lacks actionable context. Does not explain WHEN to call it, WHAT it returns, or WHY it matters for workflow recovery.
No parameter descriptions in MCP schema. Parameter names (session_id, step_name, current_state_payload) exist in client.py but are not declared with descriptions in the tools/list response.
No output schema documented. Response structure (status, checkpoint_id, session_id, state_hash, total_checkpoints_in_session, safe_rollback_target) is inferred from client.py but not declared in MCP protocol.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 37 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tool mutates state (WRITE risk) but provides no error classification, retry guidance, or compensation mechanism if checkpoint fails.