Loading ToolBench
MCP Server for registering in-memory code strings as importable Python modules without file I/O
Single tool with minimal schema and description. Tool name 'register_virtual_module' is verb-based and clear, but description is only 67 characters, below the 194-char baseline for production tools. No output schema documented. No error handling guidance. No parameter constraints or validation hints. Tool performs a write operation (registers code) but description does not explicitly state this is a state-modifying action.
Register in-memory code string as importable Python module.
Parameter descriptions missing. 'module_name' and 'code' have no descriptions in the schema. LLMs cannot infer what format 'code' expects (raw Python string? Escaped? Multi-line?) or constraints on 'module_name' (alphanumeric only? Dots allowed for submodules?).
No output schema documented. Tool returns a JSON object with 'status' and 'module' fields, but this structure is not declared in the tool definition. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations or validate responses.
Description does not state this is a write/state-modifying operation. Agents need to know which calls are safe to retry and which have side effects. Current description: 'Register in-memory code string as importable Python module.' should clarify: 'Registers (or overwrites) Python code as an importable module in memory.'
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 46 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No error handling guidance. Tool does not document what happens if 'module_name' is invalid (e.g., contains spaces, reserved keywords, or conflicts with stdlib). No recovery hints for LLM.
No parameter constraints. 'code' parameter accepts arbitrary Python strings with no validation hints. LLMs may pass incomplete, malformed, or dangerous code (e.g., code that imports and executes external payloads). Description should specify: 'Valid Python 3.9+ code string. Will be executed via exec() in the module namespace.'