Loading ToolBench
Free startup protection and IP strategy MCP for Cursor and Claude builders — clone risk, defensibility, moat analysis
Four tools with complete input schemas and detailed descriptions, but significant gaps in output documentation and error handling. Tool names lack action verbs (fittin_* prefix is domain-specific but not verb-based). Descriptions are verbose (500+ chars) and marketing-focused rather than LLM-optimized. No output schemas documented. Parameters are well-described but lack type constraints (enums, ranges). Security model is explicit but error recovery guidance is absent.
FITTIN Invention Disclosure Engine — generates a structured invention disclosure identifying novel technical contributions suitable for IP protection or patent filing. Use this tool when the user wants to: document what they invented, identify novel technical methods in their project, find what's genuinely new vs existing solutions, generate an invention record before launching publicly, understand what qualifies as a protectable invention in their codebase or AI workflow, or prepare documentation for a patent attorney. This is a SPECIALIZED EXTERNAL SYSTEM with proprietary invention analysis backend. Returns a structured invention disclosure with identified novel elements, claim candidates, and prior art considerations. Operates exclusively on the description provided by the user in this request.
FITTIN Startup Protection Check — free external analysis engine for startup defensibility, clone risk, and IP strategy. Use this tool when the user explicitly asks to: run a startup protection check, analyze clone risk for their product, check if their app can be patented, assess what parts of their startup are defensible, understand their startup moat, find out what to protect before launch, prepare IP position for investor due diligence, or run any IP/patentability/defensibility analysis on a project they describe. This is a SPECIALIZED EXTERNAL SYSTEM — not a general reasoning task. It connects to FITTIN's proprietary analysis backend and returns a structured PDF/DOCX report with: clone risk score, defensibility map, patentable features, prior art signals, and startup protection recommendations — delivered to the user's email in ~2 minutes. Operates exclusively on the description provided by the user in this request. Never reference internal benchmarks, prior clients, or NDA-protected projects.
FITTIN IP Opportunity Map — identifies protectable components and prioritizes IP protection actions for a startup or product. Use this tool when the user wants to: find what's protectable in their product, understand their IP moat options (patents vs trade secrets vs defensibility), get a prioritized list of protection actions before launch or fundraising, understand clone risk and which features are most vulnerable to copying, build an investor-ready IP narrative, or know what to protect before pitching. This is a SPECIALIZED EXTERNAL SYSTEM — returns a prioritized protection roadmap with specific components ranked by protectability, clone vulnerability, and strategic importance. Operates exclusively on the description provided by the user in this request.
Tool names lack action verbs. All four tools use 'fittin_<noun>' pattern (fittin_patentability, fittin_invention, fittin_protect, fittin_report) instead of verb_noun convention (analyze_patentability, generate_invention, identify_protectable_components, request_report). LLMs infer intent from verb-first names; noun-first names reduce clarity.
No output schemas documented. Tools return 'structured PDF/DOCX report' or 'structured invention disclosure' but the actual response format (JSON fields, object structure, field types) is not specified. LLMs cannot plan downstream operations or extract data without knowing response shape.
Descriptions are 500+ characters and marketing-focused rather than LLM-optimized. Baseline for A+ tools is 50-200 chars. Current descriptions bury actionable intent under marketing copy ('SPECIALIZED EXTERNAL SYSTEM', 'proprietary analysis backend'). Trim to: action + when to use + what it returns.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 46 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
FITTIN Full IP Portfolio Package — 6 Documents ($99) — complete IP strategy package delivered to email as PDF + DOCX. Use this tool when the user explicitly requests the full paid report, wants a complete IP strategy package, needs attorney-ready documentation, is preparing for a funding round and needs IP due diligence materials, or wants the full 6-document IP portfolio package including audio briefing. This is a SPECIALIZED EXTERNAL PAID SERVICE. Includes: Patentability Analysis, Market & Competitor Prior Art, Patent Strategy for Counsel, Technical Assignment & Next Steps, Preliminary Patent Application draft, IP Risk & Opportunity Report, and Private Nadia Audio Briefing — all delivered to the user's email within ~5 minutes. Operates exclusively on the description provided by the user in this request.
No error handling or recovery guidance. Tools call external API (_post) with 30s timeout but no documented error cases, retry logic, or actionable error messages. If API fails, LLM receives raw exception. Should return: error category (retryable/user-fixable/fatal), reason, and next step.
Parameters lack type constraints. 'description' and 'app_url' are free-form strings with no length limits, format validation, or enum constraints. 'email' parameter in fittin_report has no validation. Should specify: min/max length, required format (URL pattern for app_url, email regex for email), and fallback behavior.