Three tools with basic verb naming (get_, compute_, add) but significant quality gaps. All tools have descriptions (10-50 chars, below the 194-char baseline), but lack depth on WHEN to use them or what they return. Input schemas are present with type info but parameter descriptions are minimal or missing. No output schema documentation. Error handling returns generic strings ('Unable to...') with no recovery guidance. Tools are simple utilities with no composition risk, but descriptions fail to meet LLM-optimization standards.

• Expand tool descriptions to 100-200 chars. Example: 'get_uuid: Generate a random UUID v4 string. Use this when you need a unique identifier for creating new records or sessions. Returns a 36-character UUID string (e.g., 550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000).'
• Document output schemas explicitly. Add a 'Returns' section to each tool docstring specifying the type and format (e.g., 'Returns: str (UUID v4 format, 36 chars)' or 'Returns: str (MD5 hex digest, 32 chars)').
• Replace generic error messages with actionable recovery guidance. Instead of 'Unable to compute hash', return 'Failed to compute hash: backend service unavailable. Retry in 5 seconds or check if the input text exceeds 1MB.'
• Add parameter constraints to descriptions. For 'add', specify: 'left: int (range: -2^31 to 2^31-1)' and 'right: int (range: -2^31 to 2^31-1)'. For 'compute_hash', add: 'data: str (max 1MB, UTF-8 encoded)'.
• Consider renaming 'add' to 'add_integers' or 'sum_integers' to clarify the operation and domain. Similarly, 'compute_hash' could be 'compute_md5_hash' to be more specific.