Loading ToolBench
Testing Intelligence Network Automation Assistant — Managed Service Platform for continuous quality management. Provides MCP tools for product registration, quality scoring, playbook execution, and test management.
TINAA MSP defines 5 tools with reasonable naming (verb_noun pattern) and descriptions. However, critical gaps exist: parameter descriptions are sparse or missing entirely, output schemas are undocumented, and error handling guidance is absent. The 'environments' parameter in register_product uses a dict type without specifying structure or constraints. Most tools lack pagination guidance despite returning lists. Descriptions are adequate (100-200 chars) but lack actionable context for LLM selection. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) despite clear read/write distinctions.
Get detailed product info including environments, endpoints, quality score, and recent test runs.
Get the current quality score for a product, with breakdown by component. Aggregates test health, performance metrics, security posture, and accessibility results into a single quality score with trend analysis.
List all registered products, optionally filtered by status.
Register a new product for quality management. Creates a product record in TINAA MSP, associating it with one or more deployment environments for continuous testing and monitoring.
Execute a specific test playbook against an environment. Runs a named playbook and returns a summary of results including pass/fail counts, duration, and the impact on the product quality score.
Output schemas completely undocumented. No tool returns a documented structure, LLMs cannot plan downstream calls or extract required fields. Critical for tool chaining.
Parameter 'environments' in register_product is typed as 'dict' with no schema, structure, or constraints. LLMs cannot infer valid format (nested object? flat mapping?). Violates constrained-input pattern.
No error handling guidance. Tools lack recovery hints (e.g., 'If product not found, call list_products first'). Errors will not guide LLM recovery.
list_products lacks pagination parameters (limit, offset, page_size). No indication of result count limits. Large product lists will blow context window.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | D | 55 | 2026-07-28+ | v2 |
No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint). register_product and run_playbook are clearly destructive/write operations but lack explicit marking for agent safety.