Server has 16 tools with consistent naming (verb_noun pattern) and descriptions present for all. However, output schemas are entirely undocumented, no tool declares what fields it returns, forcing LLMs to guess structure. Parameter descriptions are present but often generic (e.g., 'PID of the scsynth/supernova process' repeated 8 times). Error handling is absent, tools return strings with no guidance on failure modes, retryability, or recovery steps. No input validation constraints (enums, ranges) visible. Security concerns: WRITE tools lack confirmation/dry-run patterns and permission gates. Composition is reasonable (single responsibility per tool), but many tools return opaque string responses rather than structured JSON.

• Document output schemas for all 16 tools. Specify return type (object/array), field names, types, and descriptions. E.g., get_servers should return {servers: [{pid: int, cpu: float, memory: float, osc_port: int}], total: int}.
• Add error handling to WRITE tools. Return structured responses: {success: bool, message: string, error_code?: string, retryable?: bool, next_steps?: string}. E.g., execute_supercollider_code should indicate compilation errors vs OSC connection failures.
• Implement confirmation/dry-run for irreversible operations. Add optional dry_run: bool parameter to execute_supercollider_code, reboot_supercollider_server. Return what would happen without executing.
• Replace generic parameter descriptions with constraints. E.g., freq_hz: 'Frequency in Hz (20 - 20000, default 440)'; amp: 'Amplitude 0 - 1 (default 0.15)'; duration_s: 'Duration in seconds (0.1 - 60, default 1.0)'.
• Consolidate discovery tools. Clarify when to call get_servers (quick list) vs discover_supercollider (detailed probe) vs list_server_candidates (debug). Add a discovery guide in server instructions.