Local MCP server bridging to the hosted Etch service at etch.systems.
This server proxies tool definitions from a remote Etch service. The single tool 'dynamic_tools_from_remote' is inferred rather than explicitly registered with a schema. No input schema is visible in the source code. The description is generic and does not explain what parameters the tool accepts, what it returns, or when to use it. Tool definitions are fetched at runtime from a remote endpoint, making static analysis impossible. The server acts as a transparent proxy with no local tool definitions, schemas, or parameter documentation.
Tools are dynamically fetched from the remote Etch service. The server does not define static tools but instead proxies all tool calls to the remote endpoint.
No input schema visible for the tool. Tool definitions are dynamically fetched from remote Etch service at runtime, making static schema validation impossible. LLMs cannot determine valid parameters or structure.
Tool description is generic and uninformative (28 chars). Does not explain what parameters the tool accepts, what it returns, or when to use it. LLMs cannot determine tool purpose from this description alone.
Tool is inferred rather than explicitly registered with schema in source code. The server proxies all tool calls to a remote endpoint without defining local tool metadata. Per hard scoring rules, inferred tools cap at 50 overall.
No parameter descriptions or type information. The remote tools are fetched dynamically, so no static parameter documentation exists in the server code. Agents cannot understand what inputs each tool expects.
Inferred effective spec: <=2025-11-25.
| Scored | Grade | Overall | Spec posture | Rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | F | 27 | <=2025-11-25 | v2 |
No error handling guidance. Tool call failures return raw RuntimeError messages without recovery hints. LLMs receive no actionable guidance on what to do if a tool call fails.