Server has 6 tools with basic schemas and descriptions, but significant gaps prevent production use. All tools have descriptions (positive), but most are under 100 chars and lack actionable context. Parameter descriptions exist but are minimal (e.g., 'Suchbegriff' for query). No output schemas documented. Error handling is absent, tools return bare dicts without recovery guidance. No tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint). Naming is acceptable (verb_noun pattern), but composition issues exist: create_workflow and rate_workflow both modify state but lack confirmation/dry-run patterns. The server lacks pagination guidance despite search_workflows returning potentially large result sets.

• Add output schemas to all tools. Document the exact fields, types, and meanings. E.g., search_workflows returns [{name: str, category: str, uses: int, avg_rating: float, ...}].
• Expand descriptions to 100 - 200 chars. Include WHEN to use the tool and WHAT it returns. E.g., 'Search for workflow templates by keyword, category, or tag. Returns up to 10 matching workflows sorted by popularity. Call this to discover workflows before calling get_workflow.'
• Add error recovery hints. E.g., get_workflow: 'If workflow not found, call search_workflows(query=name) to find similar templates.' rate_workflow: 'Rating must be 1 - 5. If invalid, the operation fails, no partial credit.'
• Implement dry-run or confirmation for create_workflow and rate_workflow. E.g., add a 'confirm' parameter or return a confirmation token that must be passed in a follow-up call.
• Document pagination for search_workflows. Add offset/cursor parameter and return total_count and has_more fields so agents can fetch results in batches.